As Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military, and the one whose office mobilized that military in an aggressive action toward a nation that had posed us no threat, George W. Bush bears the highest level of direct responsibility for the genocidal debacle in Iraq.

So an Iraqi throwing a fucking shoe or two at him was appropriate, but woefully inadequate. I think Bush deserves a fate at least as harsh as another head of state who was ‘convicted’ of killing only a few hundred Iraqis*.

Yeah, this seems about right. But of course, the American Exceptionalists will probably blanch at the concept, because, to them, even our worst and most bloodthirsty leaders are severely punished enough by negative liberal vibes and term limits. (We had a chance to deal with Bush more definitively, but “impeachment [was] off the table.” With that kind of spinelessness, it’s no wonder ‘liberal’ has become so firmly pejorative.)

*Though he was obviously guilty of killing countless thousands more, Saddam Hussein’s ‘trial’ didn’t cover those because of the quantifiable complicity of the U.S. in the majority of those killings. I guess this isn’t a good time to talk about our national reverence for ‘rule of law.’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s